海洋地质系女高材生安菲本默默暗恋着一个年轻有为的科学家莫凉，期待着有一天能成为业内顶尖科研人员和海洋卫士，以和心上人比肩。突然一天，她的生活中出现一个总是给她带来厄运的美少年——叶海，一切都被其打乱。叶海不仅和莫凉所负责的海洋能源实验项目作对，还”满口胡诌”告诉安菲她曾是自己的妻子，两人有共同负责保护海洋的职责。奇怪和自负的叶海让安菲避之不及，然而实验项目的发展事态大大超出安菲想象，其潜在危害正如叶海所言。同时她也发现，自己记忆深处确实和叶海有着一丝情感牵连，并且叶海的身上，存在一股力图挽救危机前的海洋的强大能量。两人最终如传说中的海皇波塞冬与海后安菲特里忒，担负起保护大海的职责。On the morning of May 15, 2013, Aunt Liu was busy in the kitchen early. This morning, her son and daughter-in-law had an appointment to go home for breakfast. After waiting for a long time and seeing no one, Aunt Liu called the couple. As a result, both phones were turned off. Aunt Liu waited until more than ten o'clock. When the food was cold, she did not say anything about her son and daughter-in-law. Aunt Liu was a little panicked and hurried to her son's house. She pushed her son's door and found that the door was left unlocked. When she approached the door, she found no one in the living room. "What's the matter with you? Your cell phone is turned off!" Aunt Liu shouted loudly, but no one answered. She could only continue to walk to the bedroom. "What did I say you were doing?" Aunt Liu knocked on the bedroom door and asked, but no one answered. She pushed open the bedroom door and saw that the bed was clean and the couple was not at home. In addition, she did not find anything unusual at home. However, when she turned around and came out, the scene in the yard frightened her to disgrace. In the yard, the son's dog fell into a pool of blood. A blood hole was cut out of his head and thrown into the corner of the wall. The bricks beside him were covered with blood. Seeing that the ground was covered with blood, Aunt Liu collapsed with fear and called 110 to call the police.根据两大新研究学者的真实故事作为背景，讲述两位新教育研究专家主人公威廉· 马斯特斯医生（麦克·辛饰）和他的助手弗吉妮娅·约翰逊（丽兹·卡潘饰）不惜一切地发起一场新爱革命的故事。他们坚持自己的信念，不理会世人封建的眼光、无惧怕身败名裂的风险，誓要作研究新学的先锋。由即将上演的导演和编剧绘制的独特戏剧中的第二部，讲述的是演员突然中断拍摄的那天。 著名演员竹内龙马扮演自己的八个平行故事。On the same day, when investors went to the scene to defend their rights, the police and the building security guards also actively asked the investors to register the information first, and then collectively went to the Public Security Bureau to report the case. Only when a certain amount of money was reached could the case be filed. Therefore, the case was filed and recovered quickly, and then fate was resigned. In the end, the amount of money that could be recovered was counted as much as possible. There was no anger.This process is just speculation. I didn't analyze the source code in depth, but I typed a log and the result was that a series of dispatchTouchEvent () did return true. In other words, ViewGroup1 and ViewGroup2 did not have a consumption event, but dispatchTouchEvent () returned true, so an online saying: DispatchTouchEvent () returned true is a consumption event. This statement may not be completely accurate, but we still need to go to the source code to find the answer. We will not analyze it here, but only explain one problem: don't rewrite dispatchTouchEvent () easily. Even if overridden, try to ensure that the super method is called and the return value is consistent with the super result. In fact, the source code already provides two interfaces to indirectly rewrite it, namely onInterceptTouchEvent () and onTouchEvent (), which can be known from the source code that they are eventually called by dispatchTouchEvent (). Moreover, it is no problem to use the return value of onTouchEvent () to describe whether to consume the event (View that does not consume the event cannot call onTouchEvent () at all).
